Army Threatened With Lawsuit Over 'Sectarian' Prayer

Now, more than four months after the incident in San Antonio, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation is preparing to file a federal lawsuit if the Army refuses to review -- and appropriately respond -- to Gettman's complaints.

Gettman's story was first reported by The Huffington Post this past October: She recounted how she and her fellow soldiers from the 264th Medical Battalion were attending a mandatory suicide prevention session -- part of the military's resilience training -- when a chaplain took the stage and led the room in a mass prayer that Gettman, an atheist, characterized as sectarian.

"The chaplain said we have to have something bigger than ourselves. We need, and he stresses need, to have something divine in our life," she recalled.

She said the lights were turned off, candles were passed around, and the chaplain told the soldiers to bow their heads. "The entire theater was forced into a mass Christian prayer," Gettman said. "I heard him refer to his 'Heavenly Father' and 'Lord.'"

Gettman, a 17-year Army veteran, knew the prayer session was optional. However, the room was filled with soldiers fresh out of boot camp, and Gettman felt those younger individuals -- who included a Buddhist student and at least two Jewish soldiers -- may have thought the prayer was mandatory, just as the suicide prevention session was.

After going to her supervisors, Gettman filed written complaints both to the Army's Inspector General and her base's equal opportunity office, charging that the chaplain's sectarian prayer was a violation of Army regulations and the U.S. Constitution's establishment clause.

According to Gettman, who talked to HuffPost Thursday, her complaints were met with a string of unprofessional, combative meetings that eventually led her to seek legal advice.

In her first meeting with an equal opportunity advisor, Gettman told HuffPost, the EOA as "very hostile," first trying to dissuade her from filing a formal complaint before giving her the wrong paperwork, which Gettman quickly recognized and pointed out. Gettman also alleged that the EOA frequently cut her off and repeatedly read to her the definitions of covert and overt mandatory prayer to make sure that Gettman understood the difference -- behavior she described as "condescending."

"After I had that meeting with the EO[A], and I was so disgusted with the way he treated me that first time, I went to my leadership -- I went to my first sergeant -- and I told him the whole story," Gettman explained. "A couple days later, he comes back to me and says it was just a miscommunication ... I was horrified by that too. It felt like I was being blown off."

Gettman completed a series of sworn statements and then waited for updates on the status of her complaints -- but they never came. Months later, after returning from the "Christmas Exodus" break, she went to her first-line EOA for information. She said she was then contacted by a different EOA, who told her the case had been ruled unsubstantiated in mid-November -- an outcome that shocked Gettman, since she said she had never been informed of that decision.

She now feels that she has exhausted all of her options. "I'm so frustrated, I'm so aggravated," Gettman said. "I just don't know what to do."